1. http://www.sciencekids.co.nz/sciencefacts/animals/monkey.html
I chose this website because it was clear and easy for young children to follow so I would give it a 5 for design. The navigibality for this website was done fairly well. I would rate that a 4 because it is clear and logical for students.
2. http://www.kidzworld.com/article/24831-all-about-animals-monkeys
This website was an excellent source of information. The design for this website was rated a 4 due to its lack of errors and fair organization. This website also did no attempt to sell itself to the student leaving it with a level of 5 for Bias.
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG1vkfndMXE
I chose this video because it is a creative and outgoing look on displaying facts about Monkeys. I feel that the relevance should have a level of 5. It was done in a way that students learned instructional objectives in a entertaining way.
4. http://facts.randomhistory.com/2008/12/15_monkeys.html
This site shared information but lacked creativity. When rating the design of this website I would give it a 2.
5.http://www.monkeyfun.tripod.com/id11.html
This website received a 1 for authority. There were no authors given to the reader straight from the site. Also, there were no citations for this cite which I feel then it should receive a 1 as well.
6.http://firstchildhoodeducation.blogspot.com/2013/08/facts-about-monkeys-for-kids.html
This website had numerous educational facts for students. It did not have that much design to catch the eye of a reader so it received a 3 for design. There were no obvious errors but lacked creativity.
7. http://kids.nationalgeographic.com/kids/animals/creaturefeature/howler-monkey/
This website was truly amazing for this assignment. It was beyond creative and the design was also eye catching. I gave it a 5 for design. This site received a 5 for a bias. There were viewpoints presented but no bias at all.
8.http://www.findfast.org/facts-about-monkeys.htm
This website caught my eye by its captivating pictures. There is excellent organization so it received a 5 for design. The navigability was clear and upfront so it received a 5.
I chose this website because it was clear and easy for young children to follow so I would give it a 5 for design. The navigibality for this website was done fairly well. I would rate that a 4 because it is clear and logical for students.
2. http://www.kidzworld.com/article/24831-all-about-animals-monkeys
This website was an excellent source of information. The design for this website was rated a 4 due to its lack of errors and fair organization. This website also did no attempt to sell itself to the student leaving it with a level of 5 for Bias.
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG1vkfndMXE
I chose this video because it is a creative and outgoing look on displaying facts about Monkeys. I feel that the relevance should have a level of 5. It was done in a way that students learned instructional objectives in a entertaining way.
4. http://facts.randomhistory.com/2008/12/15_monkeys.html
This site shared information but lacked creativity. When rating the design of this website I would give it a 2.
5.http://www.monkeyfun.tripod.com/id11.html
This website received a 1 for authority. There were no authors given to the reader straight from the site. Also, there were no citations for this cite which I feel then it should receive a 1 as well.
6.http://firstchildhoodeducation.blogspot.com/2013/08/facts-about-monkeys-for-kids.html
This website had numerous educational facts for students. It did not have that much design to catch the eye of a reader so it received a 3 for design. There were no obvious errors but lacked creativity.
7. http://kids.nationalgeographic.com/kids/animals/creaturefeature/howler-monkey/
This website was truly amazing for this assignment. It was beyond creative and the design was also eye catching. I gave it a 5 for design. This site received a 5 for a bias. There were viewpoints presented but no bias at all.
8.http://www.findfast.org/facts-about-monkeys.htm
This website caught my eye by its captivating pictures. There is excellent organization so it received a 5 for design. The navigability was clear and upfront so it received a 5.